When did Matisyahu grow the Payos? He certainly didn’t have them when he was Lubavitch!
His song “One Day” is the Olympics Anthem for Vancouver 2010.
You are currently browsing the Rafi Hecht's Blog blog archives for February, 2010.
Extracted from Vos Is Neias.
Personally, I have a big problem in respecting viewpoints that suggest completely suppressing/destroying something that can clearly benefit Klal Yisrael in so many ways. Yes, the computer/internet has caused uneducated people to go astray, but then again, a car, useful tool as it is, has caused those not knowing how to use it properly to crash and die. Perhaps we should car-bomb every car owned by a frum Jew? Isn’t it enough that certain Hasidic groups have forbidden women to become “women drivers” and not drive cars?
I still maintain that everything revolves around one word: education. People have to learn how to properly use the computer/internet for its benefits the same way one has to learn to drive a car to benefit from it properly. As well, it’s been my personal experience that when one tries to suppress something, be it a technology or a secret, it’s usually done out of fear because the one doing the damage has a secret to hide that’s probably so painful that it’s too hard to explain in words. In many cases, that’s how terrorism and coercion start.
Fundamentalism is fundamentalism, be it when certain Muslims forbid women from wearing anything short of a burka, or when certain groups of Jews forbid modern technology, as powerful and therefore dangerous as it is, from being properly harnessed for Marbitz Torah. Clearly, the questioner from VosIsNeias is pro-computer and internet, based on the way he asked the questions.
As well, I think that 10 out of 10 reading what’s below will have a good laugh rather than believe what’s said, simply due to the fact that the reader is looking at the internet on a computer! Sadly, what the Rabbi says isn’t Purim Torah, it’s said in dead seriousness.
On one hand, I can hear where the Rabbi is coming from. He’s trying to preserve Yiddishkeit the best way he can. If he isn’t computer/internet savvy, how can he have his Talmidim who are in danger and a technology he’s unfamiliar with coexist? One must go, and the computer is therefore the most viable of the two. Somehow I don’t think that that way of thought will “fly” when it comes to choosing the Chachamim during the times of the 3rd Bais HaMikdash, being that the Chachamim need to be well-rounded in all cultures and languages, and open-minded to accept differing thoughts, LeShem Shamayim.
Just my 2c.
-Rafi
————–
Jerusalem – VIN News posted earlier an Editorial by Rabbi Yair Hoffman criticizing an event where an Israeli Rabbi in a Yeshiva for Baalei Teshuva in Yerushalayim is shown on a YouTube clip
holding a ceremony destroying a laptop to protest the danger of the Internet.

Rosh Yeshiva, Rav Aaron Feinhandler
Some readers have emailed us claiming it was a Purim Prank, we decided to verify the facts of the story, and sure enough it turns out this was a serious event.
Below is an Exclusive interview VIN News Israeli correspond Ezra Reichmann just conducted with the Rosh Yeshiva, Rav Aaron Feinhandler, to hear why he decided to publicize the computer-pulverizing event.
VIN: What’s so bad about a computer?
Rabbi Feinhandler: The computer and specifically the Internet has broken up many families — both religious and non-religious. For the past 25 years, every week dozens of baalei tshuva from all over the country spend a Shabbos at our yeshiva and I am involved in counseling many of them. I know many people whose sholom bayis was ruined because of it. I have given speeches in countless places explaining how dangerous the Internet is.
On the Internet you see women without their hair covered – so why does your wife have to cover hers? If you see immodest pictures on the Internet, why are you putting up mechitzos at weddings? Why are you sending your children to chareidi chinuch if you’re getting the Islamic and Christian world on the Internet?
The reason we send our children to chareidi chinuch is because we want to keep out everything that is out there. So why are we bringing the Internet into our home? We want to dance at two weddings, but it doesn’t go.
Why did Moshe Rabeinu break the Two Luchos? He did it to shock the Jews. He wanted them to understand that the Golden Calf doesn’t go together with the Two Luchos.
Eliyahu Hanavi did the same thing. He told the Jews of his time: Go with Elokim or go with baal — but you can’t have both together.
VIN: Whose computer did you break?
Rabbi Feinhandler: The computer we broke this time belonged to a photographer. He used his computer to develop his pictures, but then he realized it was causing him to fall spiritually. He decided he’s better off taking pictures with a camera and then he’ll develop the film in a photo shop.
By the way, this is the 3rd time we’ve shattered a computer. The first computer we broke was a $1,000 computer belonging to a bochur who wanted to save himself from the temptation of watching films.
VIN: Don’t you have a computer in your yeshiva’s office?
Rabbi Feinhandler: We have no computer in our yeshiva’s office. How do we print letters? We send a handwritten letter to an office service by fax, and they return it printed instead of by email. We pay them for the service. And we have plenty of office work; we have 75 bochurim in our yeshiva and 40 girls in our girls’ division.
VIN: Why don’t you use computers with Rimon or Netiv filtering servers?
Rabbi Feinhandler: If we can’t get people to get rid of the computer completely, we tell people to use Rimon or Netiv. We don’t like to rely on them, because you can get rid of the filters. We know of people who managed to evade the filters, and then they fell into bad things. We can tell you countless stories of youth who left yeshivos and took off their kipot and girls who stopped dressing modestly because of the influence of the Internet.
Lev L’achim say that 70% of all youths who leave Yiddishkeit is because of the Internet or cellphones.
Our boys visit homes voluntarily to try to get people to remove their computers or at least change to a kosher service with filtering.
VIN: Do your students have computers?
Rabbi Feinhandler: Our yeshiva will not accept students who have a computer or unkosher cellphone. When we make shidduchim for our students, we stipulate that the home they found will not have a computer, they will work on a computer at a workplace only if it has filtering, and they will only use kosher cellphones. We won’t make a shidduch for any of our baalei tshuva unless they agree to these conditions.
It goes without saying that you won’t be accepted to our kolel if you have a computer at home or unkosher cellphone.
VIN: What’s wrong with having a computer at home if you have filtering on it? Isn’t it better to expose kids to the computer in a controlled way, rather than having them go elsewhere to see a computer unsupervised?
Rabbi Feinhandler: We feel you have to get rid of computer from your house, period. From my experience, once you have a computer in the house, your child will get used to seeing films. Chiloni films on discs are everywhere, a dime a dozen. The kid will quickly figure out that when Abba is not home or is sleeping, he can watch chiloni films without them knowing about it. After all, Ima and Aba said it’s OK to use a computer and they see all kinds of things on it too.
In a home where there’s no computer and kids don’t get used to seeing it, the kids don’t go around looking for it.
It’s not just a problem for the kids. It’s a problem for the adults too. The parents start seeing films and other things and that brings a big yerida to the home. If there’s no computer at home, the parents and kids will both be OK and won’t fall into problems.
Many families were broken up through meetings which began on the Internet. We want to save people from tragedy. Even many goyim admit that the Internet destroyed their lives. Kal v’chomer us, the am hakodesh, have to keep away from it.
Having a computer in the house is the same as having a cinema theater in house.
With a nonkosher cellphone, you can get connected to the Internet in a minute. It’s like a cinema theater in your pocket. I can tell you that whoever doesn’t listen to the rabbonim on this matter will fall. The temptation is too huge to withstand. Whoever listens to the rabbonim on this matter will have hatzlacha. Whoever cannot withstand the temptation of getting rid of their computer completely should at the minimum get a filtering service.
VIN: What if you need to work on a computer at home or at work?
Rabbi Feinhandler: They need to work on the Internet for their parnossa? It’s better to clean streets and dirty your body than to work on the Internet and dirty your soul.
The Chofetz Chaim told a person who was selling books of kefira that he would arrange a job for him to ring the bell to call goyim to church. When the Yid protested how could he do that, the Chofetz Chaim told him it’s better to ring the bell to bring goyim to church then to sell books of kefira which will bring Yidden to leave Yiddishkeit. The Internet is far worse than books of kefira.
On the occasion of Purim, the Israel Antiquities Authority is presenting an online exhibition of ancient masks and rattles
In honor of the Purim holiday, the Israel Antiquities Authority is presenting a new virtual exhibition on its website, www.antiquities.org.il , of masks and rattles that were discovered in archaeological excavations around the country.
Appearing in the exhibition are various masks that portray humans and animals, the oldest of which is from the Stone Age and dates to c. 6500 BCE.
A mask may change a person’s identity, his age and gender, social status and everyday appearance. Many ceremonial masks were used for ritual purposes such as rainmaking, curing disease and exorcising spirits and demons. Oftentimes such masks were in the image of deities or demons.
The use of rattles during the reading of the scroll is a symbolic expression of the extermination of the Amalekites, the first people whom the Israelites fought when they were wandering in the desert (Exodus 17:8-13). According to tradition, Haman was a descendant of the Amalekites.
Clay rattles that contain small stones or other materials for making noise were found in archaeological excavations in the country. The rattles occur in a variety of shapes, some are adorned with a painted or engraved decoration, but all of them produce the same noise that is characteristic of a rattle.
Most of the rattles were found in a cultic context or inside tombs and therefore there are those who believe that they were primarily used for ritual purposes. The frequency with which rattles occur in excavations throughout the country is explained by the fact that they are small objects that were relatively easy to manufacture and were used by the general population. There is the assertion that the clay rattle was an important musical instrument in the religious practices of the Kingdom of Israel and the Kingdom of Judah during the First Temple period.
One thing I am sure that never occurred to these “zealots” is, what about the issue of Baal Tashchis? They could have sold the laptop for a few shekels and used it to buy (Kabbalah) seforim!
Why would anyone would do this? Furthermore, why they would put a video of it on the Internet, no less! I firmly believe that Judaism is centered around balance, and people of this nature certainly seem to lack balance.
The following is from the 5 Towns Jewish Times web site at http://bit.ly/bidLyz It’s a shame that the person who wrote it did not put his or her name on it.
Our Growing Insanity
International News
on Tuesday, February 23, 2010
”
There is a growing tendency among the Torah world to reject technology and innovation. The rejection has reached an extremeness bordering on a Talibanesque fundamentalism, unseen throughout our history. A good case can be made that this rejection runs counter to true Torah Judaism, and should not be subsumed under the rubric of Ailu veAilu divrei Elokim Chaim.
Before we examine and analyze it, it may be instructive to examine a well known Gemorah in Meseches Avodah Zarah (2b). The Talmud tells us that in the future the western powers will stand before Hashem and declare that all their technological innovations were made by them for the sole purpose of enabling Klal Yisroel to learn Torah. Hashem responds, “You are the greatest fools in the world! You paved streets and created side streets for your own licentious purposes! You built bathhouses for your own pleasures!”
The greatest of our commentaries pose the question as to how could these western powers be so foolish? Did they not know they did it for their own purposes which had nothing to do with Torah?
Rav Tzaddok HaKohain (Pri Yitzchok Parshas VaYeirah) explains that Hashem’s purpose in all the technological innovation was, in fact, so that Klal Yisroel could better learn Torah. The mistake of the west will lie in self-deception as to their own motives and rationalizations – but the essence of the issue is true. All technological innovation is so that we can better learn Torah.
Which brings us all to a very significant question: Shouldn’t we recognize this point?
Should we not embrace the fact that there is such a thing as the Otsar HaTeshuvos with 25,000 seforim available to be searched and printed, with the Tzuras haDaf? Should we not marvel that Hashem gave us the Bar Illan Responsa project? Can’t we recognize that Microsoft Word has Hebrew and we can all learn and type and write our chiddushim on Chumash, Shas and beyond? Don’t we recognize that Hashem created all these technologies solely for our benefit?
The Smartboard, for example, is an amazing tool for Chinuch. That combined with the Bar Ilan is one of the greatest tools since the Guttenberg press. And speaking of the Guttenberg press – are we not proud of the fact that our ancestors a mere 500 years ago jumped on the technology and printed Rashi on Chumash, Shulchan Aruch, and so many other Seforim?
The technology of the printing press could have and has been used for so much evil. Yet our Rabbonim, Achronim and mechabrim were smart enough to realize that technology should be embraced for Torah – not rejected. Loudspeakers can be used for some real horrific music. Boruch Hashem we use them for Torah. Tape recorders are used to chazar shiurim.
These were why Hashem made them. Anyone that does not recognize this is in violation of numerous Gemorahs and Chazals.
That is why a Youtube video where a laptop is destroyed by a Rosh Yeshiva in a Yeshiva for Baalei Teshuva in Yerushalayim is particularly disturbing. The link can be found at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-7A6nKuvuk0&feature=player_embedded for those who wish to see it for themselves. The viewer is left in a state of utter shock. Is this what we have come to? Rachmana Litzlan! Where is the normalcy, the saichel? Boruch hashem such people did not exist in the time of the Guttenberg press.
The question is now, who is more foolish? The western powers who will recognize that technological innovation was in fact so that Klal Yisroel will learn Torah or those who reject the technology and that it is all from Hashem in the first place?
True, with all innovations comes risk, but our task is to learn how to train ourselves to reduce or eliminate that risk, rather than to destroy the technology itself. All our kochos should be directed toward this end. In doing so we should remember the phrase yagata velo matzasa al taamin. We should also remember the notion that ain davar haomed lifnei haratzon.
If we fail to learn this lesson, then we are ignoring the gifts that Hashem has bestowed upon us. That laptop in the Youtube video could have been used to write seforim, it could and should have been used to search Shas and poskim. What we saw was an example of Bal Tashchis that ekkles the sensitivities of Torah Jews everywhere.
The insanity must stop.
”

Recently I came across a post which mentioned that Female Orthodox “Rabbah” Sara Hurwitz, recently ordained by Modern Orthodox Rabbi Avi Weiss, “is the first Orthodox female rabbi and is a part of the Rabbinic staff at the Hebrew Institute of Riverdale.” While she may be unique and radical in being a “female Orthodox Rabbi,” she’s certainly not the first.
Regina Jonas of Germany was before her, in East Berlin in 1935, and was the first publicly done. To quote an article, “A forgotten myth” by Aryeh Dayan in HaAretz:

“Regina Jonas was born on August 3, 1902 in a poor neighborhood in Berlin, many of whose residents were religious Jews who had arrived in Germany at the end of the 19th century from Eastern Europe. Like the others, her parents also came from there, had a hard time making a living, and lived an Orthodox lifestyle. Wolf Jonas, Regina’s father, was a not particularly successful merchant, who died in 1913 and left his widow Sarah and their two children, 11-year-old Regina and 13-year-old Abraham, penniless. Elisa Klapheck, editor of the Jewish monthly Juedisches Berlin, recently published a book about the life of Regina Jonas (“Fraulein Rabbiner Jonas: The Story of the First Woman Rabbi,” 2004). Klapheck discovered that the funeral for Jonas’ father, who was buried in one of the Jewish cemeteries in the city, was paid for by the neighborhood Jewish community.
The death of Regina’s father forced her mother to move to another neighborhood with the children. In the new apartment, next to a small Orthodox synagogue not far from Alexanderplatz, Regina’s life changed. She was attracted to the atmosphere of the synagogue and the rabbi, Dr. Max Weil, who was one of the first in Germany to conduct bat-mitzvah ceremonies for girls, took her under his wing. He was the one who paved the way for her studies, first in a Jewish school and afterward in the Hochschule (high school). In 1930 she was certified there as a teacher, and began to support herself and her mother as a Judaic studies teacher.
All of Jonas’ teachers praised her dissertation, but none of them agreed to ordain her for the rabbinate. Rabbi Prof. Hanoch Albeck, her Talmud teacher, explained his refusal by saying he wasn’t willing to ordain a woman. Prof. Leo Baeck, on whom Jonas had pinned great hopes, also refused to ordain her. Baeck was then already the head of the National Representation of Jews in Germany, and attributed great importance to preserving the unity of all the branches of the community with regards to the recently established Nazi regime. Although he admired Jonas and encouraged her in her studies, he was not willing to risk this unity for her sake.
Two years later, when a rabbi was finally found who agreed to ordain her, Baeck hastened to send her a letter of congratulation. In 1942, a short time before both of them were sent to Theresienstadt, he added his signature to her ordination certificate. Even after she was ordained, and in spite of the fact that the Nazi persecutions caused the Jewish communities and the spiritual leadership in Germany to dwindle steadily, she was unable to find a congregation that was willing to hire her as a rabbi. Until she was sent to Theresienstadt she fulfilled rabbinic positions only in old-age homes and hospitals of the Jewish community.
Jonas was in Theresienstadt for a little over two years, and in October 1944 was sent with her mother to Auschwitz. Her main occupation in the ghetto, as part of Dr. Frankl’s staff, was excruciating: She greeted the trains that arrived from Germany and prepared the arrivals, all of them among the best minds of German Jewry, for the terrible reality awaiting them.
In Theresienstadt she once again met Prof. Baeck, the Reform leader who 10 years earlier had refrained from signing her ordination certificate. Unlike Jonas, Baeck survived; but until his dying day in London, in 1956, he avoided mention of Jonas’ activity in the ghetto.”

As well, there have been Frum female Rabbis in the past. Look at Rashi’s daughters who all wore Tefillin. Better yet, there was actually a female Chasidic Rebbe–yes, Rebbe–in the 1800′s. She was known as the Maiden of Ludmir.

This makes one wonder what can and can’t be done. While a female is not allowed to be part of a Kehilla as a Kehilla (congregation) invokes the Shechina, and the Shechina rests on 10 men [, and not women] (source: Gemara), she STILL can do Mitzvos Aseh She’Zman Grama even though she won’t be getting the same reward as a man who’s commanded to do so. So while unusual, a woman can technically be a rabbi of an orthodox congregation. Of course, her roles would be severly reduced, and there’s always the chance she would feel bad about segregation in shul so she might combine both, thereby making the shul conservative. Also, most just aren’t ready to accept something this innovative.
Personally, while this may have been a part of our history and can be technically correct, I still find doing this offensive and a means in which it cheapens our religion. To quote a friend of mine, “We have seen enough deterioration in our beliefs and destruction of our sacred religion. when will people learn that any idea the conservative or reform movement has, just leads to a profanity of Judaism and adds to intermarriage. We have learned time and time again that an idea like this will never lead to a greater sanctification of G-d’s name which is the true purpose of a Orthodox Jew, male or female. This is just wrong on so many more levels.”
According to another friend of mine, “There is a halachik problem with women assuming authority positions. The source is the sifri (medrash) on the posuk “tasim alecha melech” (place before you a King). The sifri says melech (King) and not a malka (Queen). I think the Rambam quotes this medrash also.”
I agree with both opinions. Keep in mind though that German Orthodoxy was the most assimilated of its time in all of Europe, such that when Reformed (deformed) Judaism came out in Germany, there was a fine line between that and German Orthodox Jewish practice. Most people didn’t wear Yarmulkes in public, Rabbi Shamshon Refael Hirsch’s focus was on making people “mentchen” (law-abiding citizens) first and foremost, rather than “Yidden,” etc. Yes, RSRH was combating the Reform movement, but I’m only trying to stress the level of Frumkeit in Germany in general. No longer is a Jew defined by doing mitzvos as technically as possible. If Hashem wanted that He would have made us robots without free will. We also have to “know” by using our neshama/sechel to discern what’s “just plain wrong.”
What’s next, Barbie putting on Tefillin? That exists too!
Please let me know if I’m off on anything.